Frightening and Devastating Collateral Damage by the 2020 Quid Pro Quo of the Century By Robert G. Leclair
Here we go again… During the 1998 Bill Clinton impeachment scandal a well-known hypocritical Quid Pro Quo between the Clinton/Biden duo and radical feminists gave Clinton a pass that allowed him to stay as president and continue to tout and support a hijacked VAWA. The factual evidence shows that the 1998 Quid Pro Quo was not only hypocritical but has adversely influenced and promoted the radical ideology well into 2020 by ignoring the U.S. Constitution’s due process for allegations of a domestic violence crime. And, has been the model for a similar Quid Pro Quo launched by the Biden/Harris in the 2020 presidential election.
Biden/Harris cannot defend without sounding like hypocrites . . .
When VP Candidate Harris was asked by a reporter what message would you give the women who feel like their space has been invaded in the past, by the vice president? Harris responded “I believe them, and I respect them being able to tell their story and having the courage to do it.” How can she state this belief and still accept Biden’s request to join his team as VP? Simply stated…she is a hypocrite and she betrays all women who have been abused.
If you are not yet convinced of Harris’ hypocrisy you should be able to equate her Quid Pro Quo to Clinton/Biden’s 1998 similar action. Responding to the same reporter question about Reade’s accusation of rape Harris said that she did not say she believed it, and issued a firm defense of Biden’s record on violence against women (VAWA) and women’s rights. She too is giving Biden a pass and vows to support him because he fought hard for women when he supposedly wrote the 1994 VAWA and supported it for years . . . sound familiar!!!
Obviously, the radicals are attempting to dupe and brainwash millennials and the general public while attempting to sabotage the constitution of the USA. This is what the millennials should be wary of when casting their votes in the 2020 presidential election.
Playing the political game… I never intended to play the political game when revealing my statement of facts during my over 40 years of research. However, I am forced into playing a partisan role because it is the only game in town in 2020. Bipartisan politicians that if an investigation provides evidence of facts and reveals names associated with the facts the logical conclusions are by nature intrinsically partisan. My only recommendation is that everybody evaluate the facts and conclusions honestly and vote accordingly