DESTRUCTION OF FAMILIES AND CHILDREN
By Robert G. Leclair
In 1998 radical feminists gave Bill Clinton a pass for his sexual exploits which allowed him to stay in the office of the presidency. The pass was a
hypocritical gesture by radical feminists to reward him for his support and endorsement of the radical feminist movement to authorize VAWA in 1994.
His political and financial support allowed the radicals to highjack VAWA and OVW and promote their radical agenda and ideology to eliminate violence
and abuse of women and children.
Radical feminists compromised their feminism, allowing Clinton to remain in office to further secure VAWA for the radical feminist movement and allow
OVW to implement the feminist ideology. This collusion of the Clintons and radical feminists was strategically a Quid pro quo for the hijacking of
VAWA in 1994. The statements by radical feminists shown below clearly indicate that their hypocritical support during the Clinton impeachment
process was for his staunch support of VAWA and OVW.
The evidence that VAWA was influenced and controlled by the radical feminist ideology was revealed when OVW established its two major strategic
components: “100% arrests and no drop” policies. Both policies complemented the radical feminist ideology of a “patriarchal society whereby males
are the perpetrators of violence and abuse and all women are victims.” OVW even funded a study to substantiate the merits of this policy. What
happened when a private study at Harvard later refuted the claims of the OVW study was very interesting and revealing. Check it out the wording
“100% arrest” was simply changed to read “encourage arrests”.
The different and distinct treatment of Bill Clinton and Donald Trump was totally hypocritical and deceitful. In 1998, here are but a few of the quotes
by female leaders lending support to Bill Clinton:
“We are witnessing a relentless campaign -- both inside and outside the government -- to hound President Clinton out of office.”
“And some of those who are leading the charge against Mr. Clinton are among the worst foes of women's rights. The opponents of the President
have a political agenda that will harm women long after the scandal has faded from the front pages.”
“While women are angry and do not condone his conduct, women want President Clinton to remain in office.”
“Gender gaps in public opinion poll results persist, with more women than men opposing Mr. Clinton's impeachment, supporting his policies, and
approving of his presidency and leadership.”
“As feminist leaders, we will not stand idly by while a Congress made up of nearly 90 percent men attempts to remove the first president elected by
women voters. While President Clinton's record for women's rights is less than perfect, on balance women have had an ally in the White House.”
Signed by all the feminist leaders
Gloria Steinem a leading feminist stated “Clinton should be censured for lying under oath about Lewinsky in the Paula Jones deposition, perhaps also
for stupidity in answering at all.” And also stated “she felt feminists spoke for the majority of Americans in saying the Clinton-Lewinsky affair was no
one's business if there was "no coercion, harassment or violence. When Monica testified, she was very clear that she wanted and initiated this
relationship. We have to listen to what women say.”
Eleanor Smeal stated “We deplore his misconduct, but we also understand the hypocrisy of his opponents” and “it would bring to a standstill our
chances of passing the Violence Against Women Act II and the Fair Pay Act, strengthening Social Security for women, and raising the minimum wage.”
NOW article in the Herald (Jan 26, 1998) epitomizes radical feminist view on the Bill Clinton impeachment saga. Gloria Steinem clearly indicated that
the Clinton/Lewinski affair was nobody’s business, implying that the extramarital affair was consensual and therefore appropriate. Gloria omitted the
fact that Bill was married and that the affair was adultery. Evidently cheating on Hillary was no big deal at the time because the end justified the
means. However, cheating became part of the radical feminist ideology and was included in the definition of domestic violence as an “emotional abuse
of women”. Even Hillary chimed in and called Monica a “bimbo” as an apparent move to paint her as the aggressor and minimize Bill’s role in his
scandal. Monica was overwhelmed and was slighted in a federal agency, namely VAWA and OVW, whose mission was to protect women from the
abuse suffered by Monica at the hands of a president that preyed on vulnerable women.
There is no doubt that Hillary was also a radical feminist who, as you will later see, worked hard to implement the false radical ideology that would
ultimately corrupt the VAWA process and implement the failed approach by OVW to eliminate violence against women. The public was duped by an
agency whose stated mission goal was undeniably worthy and needed. Unfortunately, the radical ideology and the approach implemented would not
have achieved its goal in a million years.
Consequently, this exposé will reveal that millions of families and children have and will suffer collateral damage. If this agency is not drastically
reformed and restructured God help us! I am sure many are aware our country displays the 5 ingredients which caused the fall of the Roman Empire.
It’s a false hope to think that our divided politicians will rescue us from this quagmire.
By Robert G. Leclair
In 1998 radical feminists gave Bill Clinton a pass for his sexual exploits which allowed him to stay in the office of the presidency. The pass was a
hypocritical gesture by radical feminists to reward him for his support and endorsement of the radical feminist movement to authorize VAWA in 1994.
His political and financial support allowed the radicals to highjack VAWA and OVW and promote their radical agenda and ideology to eliminate violence
and abuse of women and children.
Radical feminists compromised their feminism, allowing Clinton to remain in office to further secure VAWA for the radical feminist movement and allow
OVW to implement the feminist ideology. This collusion of the Clintons and radical feminists was strategically a Quid pro quo for the hijacking of
VAWA in 1994. The statements by radical feminists shown below clearly indicate that their hypocritical support during the Clinton impeachment
process was for his staunch support of VAWA and OVW.
The evidence that VAWA was influenced and controlled by the radical feminist ideology was revealed when OVW established its two major strategic
components: “100% arrests and no drop” policies. Both policies complemented the radical feminist ideology of a “patriarchal society whereby males
are the perpetrators of violence and abuse and all women are victims.” OVW even funded a study to substantiate the merits of this policy. What
happened when a private study at Harvard later refuted the claims of the OVW study was very interesting and revealing. Check it out the wording
“100% arrest” was simply changed to read “encourage arrests”.
The different and distinct treatment of Bill Clinton and Donald Trump was totally hypocritical and deceitful. In 1998, here are but a few of the quotes
by female leaders lending support to Bill Clinton:
“We are witnessing a relentless campaign -- both inside and outside the government -- to hound President Clinton out of office.”
“And some of those who are leading the charge against Mr. Clinton are among the worst foes of women's rights. The opponents of the President
have a political agenda that will harm women long after the scandal has faded from the front pages.”
“While women are angry and do not condone his conduct, women want President Clinton to remain in office.”
“Gender gaps in public opinion poll results persist, with more women than men opposing Mr. Clinton's impeachment, supporting his policies, and
approving of his presidency and leadership.”
“As feminist leaders, we will not stand idly by while a Congress made up of nearly 90 percent men attempts to remove the first president elected by
women voters. While President Clinton's record for women's rights is less than perfect, on balance women have had an ally in the White House.”
Signed by all the feminist leaders
Gloria Steinem a leading feminist stated “Clinton should be censured for lying under oath about Lewinsky in the Paula Jones deposition, perhaps also
for stupidity in answering at all.” And also stated “she felt feminists spoke for the majority of Americans in saying the Clinton-Lewinsky affair was no
one's business if there was "no coercion, harassment or violence. When Monica testified, she was very clear that she wanted and initiated this
relationship. We have to listen to what women say.”
Eleanor Smeal stated “We deplore his misconduct, but we also understand the hypocrisy of his opponents” and “it would bring to a standstill our
chances of passing the Violence Against Women Act II and the Fair Pay Act, strengthening Social Security for women, and raising the minimum wage.”
NOW article in the Herald (Jan 26, 1998) epitomizes radical feminist view on the Bill Clinton impeachment saga. Gloria Steinem clearly indicated that
the Clinton/Lewinski affair was nobody’s business, implying that the extramarital affair was consensual and therefore appropriate. Gloria omitted the
fact that Bill was married and that the affair was adultery. Evidently cheating on Hillary was no big deal at the time because the end justified the
means. However, cheating became part of the radical feminist ideology and was included in the definition of domestic violence as an “emotional abuse
of women”. Even Hillary chimed in and called Monica a “bimbo” as an apparent move to paint her as the aggressor and minimize Bill’s role in his
scandal. Monica was overwhelmed and was slighted in a federal agency, namely VAWA and OVW, whose mission was to protect women from the
abuse suffered by Monica at the hands of a president that preyed on vulnerable women.
There is no doubt that Hillary was also a radical feminist who, as you will later see, worked hard to implement the false radical ideology that would
ultimately corrupt the VAWA process and implement the failed approach by OVW to eliminate violence against women. The public was duped by an
agency whose stated mission goal was undeniably worthy and needed. Unfortunately, the radical ideology and the approach implemented would not
have achieved its goal in a million years.
Consequently, this exposé will reveal that millions of families and children have and will suffer collateral damage. If this agency is not drastically
reformed and restructured God help us! I am sure many are aware our country displays the 5 ingredients which caused the fall of the Roman Empire.
It’s a false hope to think that our divided politicians will rescue us from this quagmire.